|
Below are a set of academic benchmark problems for nesting. We present the best solution found by IGEMS and the best known solution is also mentioned. For every problem you can download the ACD file and try it at home. You can of course experiment with different settings such as accuracy and pairing as long as you don't change the rotational constraints. If you come up with a better solution please send it to us and we will present it here. The results presented here are all compared by nested length. We do not present the running times because they differ between different machines. But most (but not all) of the nests are obtained within minutes or in some cases seconds on a normal laptop. More information about these problems can be found in [1].
Download all files academic_acd.zip
Summary
Albano
File: Albano.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 9980.0 (IGEMS)
Result: 9980.0 (IGEMS)
Blasz1
File: Blasz1.acd
Rotation: 180º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 2717.0 (IGEMS)
Result: 2717.0 (IGEMS)

Blasz2
File: Blasz2.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 2500.0 (IGEMS)
Result: 2500.0 (IGEMS)

Dagli
File: Dagli.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 5919.1333 (IGEMS)
Result: 5919.1333 (IGEMS)

Dighe1
File: Dighe1.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 1195.5 (IGEMS)
Result: 1195.5 (IGEMS)
Dighe2
File: Dighe2.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 1224.633 (IGEMS)
Result: 1224.633 (IGEMS)

Fu
File: Fu.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 3210.0 (IGEMS)
Result: 3210.0 (IGEMS)

Jakobs1
File: Jakobs1.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 1186.0 ([1])
Result: 1200.0 (IGEMS)
Jakobs2
File: Jakobs2.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 2556.25 (IGEMS)
Result: 2556.25 (IGEMS)
Mao
File: Mao.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 1768.0 (IGEMS)
Result: 1768.0 (IGEMS)
Marques
File: Marques.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 792.8571 (IGEMS)
Result: 792.8571 (IGEMS)
Poly1A
File: Poly1A.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: on
Best known result: 1366.1764 (IGEMS)
Result: 1366.1764 (IGEMS)

Poly2A
File: Poly2A.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: on
Best known result: 2576.6816 (IGEMS)
Result: 2576.6816 (IGEMS)
Poly2B
File: Poly2B.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: on
Best known result: 2993.5804 (IGEMS)
Result: 2993.5804 (IGEMS)
Poly3A
File: Poly3A.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: on
Best known result: 4021.1815 (IGEMS)
Result: 4021.1815 (IGEMS)
Poly3B
File: Poly3B.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: on
Best known result: 3947.2255 (IGEMS)
Result: 3947.2255 (IGEMS)
Poly4A
File: Poly4A.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: on
Best known result: 5441.8053 (IGEMS)
Result: 5441.8053 (IGEMS)
Poly4B
File: Poly4B.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: on
Best known result: 4995.8623 (IGEMS)
Result: 4995.8623 (IGEMS)
Poly5A
File: Poly5A.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: on
Best known result: 6678.0045 (IGEMS)
Result: 6678.0045 (IGEMS)
Poly5B
File: Poly5B.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: on
Best known result: 5913.5890 (IGEMS)
Result: 5913.5890 (IGEMS)
Profiles1
File: Profiles1.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 1366.4027 (IGEMS)
Result: 1366.4027 (IGEMS)

Profiles2
File: Profiles2.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 3211.1862 (IGEMS)
Result: 3211.1862 (IGEMS)
Profiles3
File: Profiles3.acd
Rotation:45º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 7974.1772 (IGEMS)
Result: 7974.1772 (IGEMS)

Profiles4
File: Profiles4.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 2452.0 (IGEMS)
Result: 2452.0 (IGEMS)
Profiles5
File: Profiles5.acd
Rotation: 15º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 3299.6916 (IGEMS)
Result: 3299.6916 (IGEMS)
Profiles6
File: Profiles6.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 3061.2076 (IGEMS)
Result: 3061.2076 (IGEMS)
Profiles7
File: Profiles7.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 1291.6081 (IGEMS)
Result: 1291.6081 (IGEMS)
Profiles8
File: Profiles8.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 1313.6177 (IGEMS)
Result: 1313.6177 (IGEMS)
Profiles9
File: Profiles9.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 1266.2056 (IGEMS)
Result: 1266.2056 (IGEMS)
Profiles10
File: Profiles10.acd
Rotation: 0º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 11160.10 ([1])
Result: 11279.98 (IGEMS)
Shapes0
File: Shapes0.acd
Rotation: 0º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 6300.00 (IGEMS,[2])
Result: 6300.00 (IGEMS,[2])
Shapes1
File: Shapes1.acd
Rotation: 180º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 5600.00 (IGEMS)
Result: 5600.00 (IGEMS)
Shapes
File: Shapes.acd
Rotation: 90º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 5800.00 (IGEMS)
Result: 5800.00 (IGEMS)
Shirts
File: Shirts.acd
Rotation: 180º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 6275.00 (IGEMS)
Result: 6275.00 (IGEMS)
Swim
File: Swim.acd
Rotation: 180º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 6230.9346 (IGEMS)
Result: 6230.9346 (IGEMS)
Trousers
File: Trousers.acd
Rotation: 180º
Part distance: 0.0
Align: off
Best known result: 24340.0 ([1])
Result: 24434.18 (IGEMS)
References
[1] A New Bottom-Left-Fill Heuristic Algorithm for the Two-Dimensional Irregular Packing Problem
Operations Research, Vol. 54, No. 3. (2006), pp. 587-601.
Burke E, Hellier R, Kendall G, Whitwell G
[2] Heuristic Approaches to irregular cutting problems
Working Paper EBMS/1993/13, European Business Management School, UC Swansea, UK
Dowsland, K. A., Dowsland, W. (1993)
|